As founder of Mentat AI Consulting, Holcombe advises schools, nonprofits, and small businesses on responsible AI use. His book Critical Moral Reasoning (published by The New York Times) redefines ethics education through real-world case studies and empirical moral logic, positioning him as a leading voice in AI ethics and educational innovation.
Critical Moral Reasoning offers a bold, modern take on ethics, blending moral philosophy with real-world case studies, empirical research, and practical reasoning skills. It challenges conventional approaches by integrating insights from moral psychology, rethinking classic theories like Rawls without political framing, and addressing timely issues such as generative AI and virtue ethics. Designed for students and critical thinkers, this book redefines how we engage with morality today.
Explore how moral philosophy meets everyday life, emerging tech, and the evolving classroom.
Why Traditional Ethics Education Falls Short in the 21st Century
Discover why outdated anthologies no longer serve today’s learners and what to replace them with.
Rawls Reframed: A Libertarian Critique of Justice Without Politics
A fresh look at John Rawls that strips away policy debates to focus on core moral reasoning.
Teaching Ethics in the Age of AI: Practical Tools for Educators
Empower students to think critically about generative AI and its ethical implications.
In today’s AI-driven world, many people believe that humans should focus only on “thinking” while AI handles the “doing.” But what if this approach is
Preview Text Can expertise develop without hands-on effort? When AI absorbs the entry-level tasks once used to build foundational ability, the result is not always
This learning module explores the intersection of AI infrastructure governance & environmental justice through a deep dive into “Project Marvel”- a proposed $14.5 billion hyperscale
Looking for a comprehensive system to navigate ethical complexity in education, AI, and leadership?
The Holcombe Ethics Framework Suite is an integrated set of five
Why do moral debates often fail?
Most moral debates fail because participants argue over conclusions rather than causes. The Moral Disagreement Diagnostic Model (MDDM) is
Can we use John Rawls’s theory of justice without inheriting contemporary political baggage?
The Justice-Without-Politics Rawlsian Reinterpretation (JWPR) separates Rawls’s core moral principles from partisan
Have questions about Critical Moral Reasoning, interest in review copies, or want to connect with the author or publisher? Reach out through the form below. We’d love to hear from you.
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typeset tingindustry Lorem Ipsum has been the industrys standard.